目前，只有部分杜克大学教员需要接受背景调查。不过，目前，政策制定者正在讨论是否将其作为整个校园的普遍政策。换句话说，每位教员都必须同意接受背景调查，然后才有资格在杜克大学就业。

学术委员会负责该决定，并计划在本周四举行更多会谈。政策变化旨在类似于全国机构的类似规定。行政副总裁凯尔·卡瓦诺 (Kyle Cavanaugh) 表示，对所有大学雇员实施通用背景调查已成为一种最佳实践，不仅在学术界，而且在所有行业。因此，杜克效仿是很自然的。

当然，虽然他支持新政策，但他想确保每个人都知道它将如何运作。他认为这应该是一个客观、彻底和保密的过程。他说，确保每项检查都以相同的方式完成也取决于大学。

博士生特里普·杨可能很快就要亲自接受背景调查，他对此很好。他说他对所有其他工作都进行了背景调查，不明白为什么他不需要为大学做背景调查。他的背景是军队，特别是情报部门，背景信息对这项工作至关重要。虽然他说信息在大学环境中可能不那么重要，但它可以在做出招聘决定时提供有益的信息。

也有可能需要对当前教职员工进行检查，但这尚未讨论。如果该政策确实达到了那个程度，卡瓦诺强调，它不会淘汰任何特定成员。相反，这将是为那些参与大学的人创造一种“受保护的氛围”。换句话说，他们希望确保在提供安全可靠的学习和就业场所时进行尽职调查。

在审查潜在职业时，最有用的背景工具可能是教育验证。公司可以投资这种类型的背调，以确定某人是否持有他们在申请中声称的学位。不过，对于对犯罪行为感兴趣的大学，他们可能希望投资额外的 US One SEARCH，该搜索在全国范围内搜索超过 4.5 亿条记录。当然，教育机构可能会配备一整套筛查工具，包括药物筛查、参考验证、注册罪犯搜索，甚至是持续的犯罪监控。只要客观地使用每种工具，他们就可以了解很多关于潜在员工和现有员工的信息。

Currently, only some Duke faculty members have to undergo background checks. Right now though, there are talks in which policy makers are deciding whether or not to make that a universal policy across the entire campus. In other words, every single faculty member would be required to consent to a background check before being eligible for employment at Duke University.

The Academic Council is in charge of the decision, and more talks are planned for this Thursday. The policy change is meant to be similar to similar regulations at institutions across the nation. Kyle Cavanaugh, Vice President for Administration says that implement universal background checks for all university hires has become a sort of best practice, not only in the academic world, but in all industries. Thus, it is only natural that Duke follows suit.

Of course, though he supports the new policy, he wants to make sure everyone knows how it will work. He believes it should be an objective, thorough, and confidential process. He says it’s also up to the university to make sure every check is done in the same way.

Ph. D. student, Tripp Young, may soon have to undergo the background check himself, and he is fine with it. He said he’s had background checks for all of his other jobs, and doesn’t see why he wouldn’t need to for the university. His background is in the military, specifically in intelligence operations, where background information can be crucial to the job. While he says that information might not be as important in the university setting, it can provide beneficial information when making hiring decisions.

There is also a possibility that the checks may be required of current faculty members, but this has not yet been discussed. If the policy does go to that extent though, Cavanaugh stressed that it would not be to weed out any particular members. Instead, it would be to create a “protected atmosphere for those involved with the university.” In other words, they want to make sure they perform their due diligence when it comes to providing a safe and secure place of learning and employment.

When it comes to vetting potential professions, the most useful background tool would likely be Education Verification. At backgroundchecks.com, companies can invest in this type of check to find out for sure whether or not someone holds the degrees they claim on their application. For universities interested in criminal behavior though, they will likely want to invest in an additional US One SEARCH, which searches more than 450 million records nationwide. Of course, educational facilities may go with an entire package of screening tools, including drug screening, reference verifications, registered offender searches, or even ongoing criminal monitoring. As long as each tool is used objectively, they can learn a lot about both potential and current employees.